HBO recently released a highly anticipated documentary claiming to uncover the identity of Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. The teaser piqued the curiosity of crypto enthusiasts, and for the first time, people began to place bets on the question: “Who is Satoshi?”
As director Hoback noted, the gambling surrounding Satoshi’s identity intensified the conversation, with Polymarket’s betting pool reaching $20 million. Hoback watched as the stakes climbed, assuring viewers he wouldn’t participate in the betting himself, but acknowledging the documentary’s impact on his reputation in the film industry.
To maintain secrecy, Hoback took significant precautions during production. Interviews were conducted in various locations, and participants could only view segments relevant to them. Additionally, the film’s editing was distributed across multiple companies, ensuring no single entity held complete information.
After over a decade of speculation, HBO concluded that Satoshi Nakamoto is Peter Todd—a name not commonly associated with the mystery. This choice, seemingly arbitrary, is underscored by the fact that even Polymarket’s options didn’t include Todd, making the assertion feel more like a meme than a revelation.
Who Is Peter Todd?
HBO’s assertion links Todd to Satoshi based on his background as an early Bitcoin Core developer and cryptography consultant. Living in Canada, Todd first contributed code to Bitcoin Core in April 2012 and has been involved in the project’s security and privacy enhancements.
Starting his career in 2008 at Gedex Inc., Todd earned a degree in media arts from OCAD University in 2011, and has since worked on multiple blockchain projects, including Mastercoin and Dark Wallet. Known for his focus on security, he actively participates in the crypto community, sharing insights on Twitter and speaking at industry events.
However, Hoback’s claim has drawn skepticism. His primary evidence relies on a misinterpreted conversation where Todd allegedly used the wrong account to respond to Nakamoto, a point Todd clarified as merely correcting Nakamoto’s post, not an indication of his identity.
Critics have pointed out inaccuracies in HBO’s timeline, noting Todd was under 23 in 2008, making it unlikely he could be Nakamoto. Moreover, Todd’s extensive consulting work suggests his Bitcoin wallet would not have remained untouched for years if he were indeed the creator.
Frustrated, Todd publicly denied being Nakamoto, calling Hoback’s theory absurd and likening it to QAnon conspiracy thinking. Following the documentary’s release, meme coins related to Todd began circulating, and when asked if he owned pets, Todd humorously replied, “I only have a pet named your mom,” inspiring the $yourmom token.
Community sentiment largely condemns HBO and Hoback for their casual treatment of such a significant topic, with many asserting that Hoback’s choice of Todd reveals his ignorance regarding Nakamoto’s true identity. Some members of the community have expressed concerns for Todd’s safety, fearing that Hoback’s claims could incite trouble given the immense value associated with Nakamoto’s assets—approximately $68 billion.
The Importance of Not Knowing Satoshi
Reflecting on the tumultuous economic climate of 2008, just months after Lehman Brothers’ collapse, the U.S. Treasury launched unprecedented bailouts. The subsequent financial crisis catalyzed the creation of Bitcoin, introduced in a paper titled “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.”
Over the past 16 years, Bitcoin’s value has skyrocketed from $0.0008 to around $62,000, accumulating a market cap of $1.3 trillion—a staggering 77.5 million percent increase. Nakamoto is believed to possess around 1.1 million bitcoins, representing the most unresolved mystery in the cryptocurrency world.
The phrase “not your keys, not your coins” resonates here; as skeptics dismissed Craig Wright’s claims to be Nakamoto, they demanded proof through wallet transactions—something HBO overlooked in their narrative.
Ultimately, the mystery surrounding Nakamoto enhances Bitcoin’s allure. This anonymity symbolizes the decentralized ethos of Bitcoin, resisting the influence of any single authority or individual. By remaining hidden, Nakamoto has preserved Bitcoin’s integrity, allowing it to transcend personal interests and become a collective consensus.
Perhaps Nakamoto’s identity is not essential. What truly matters is the philosophy behind Bitcoin and its transformative impact on the world. It offers a new financial model that challenges traditional banking monopolies, granting individuals greater control and freedom.
In a way, not knowing who Satoshi is might be the best outcome. Bitcoin’s strength lies not in a single person but in the collective effort of all its participants. We are all Satoshi—integral to this decentralized revolution and historic experiment. Knowing Nakamoto’s identity may not be necessary; Bitcoin’s evolution from a concept to a global phenomenon represents a shared desire for financial freedom and privacy, showcasing the power of technology to change the world.
We are all Satoshi.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
